Sexual orientation and refugee law: How do legal sanctions criminalizing homosexuality engage the definition of persecution?

Year Published:

Abstract

Several debates persist on how the key terms of the refugee definition apply in the context of LGB asylum claims. For example, identifying whether the thresholds of persecution have been met when the maltreatment experienced by LGB persons is often distinctive is particularly challenging. This chapter focuses on one of the most pressing of these debates, namely the status and assessment of legal sanctions that criminalize sexual acts between same-sex partners. It outlines the development of a working definition of persecution across asylum-granting jurisdiction and follows with a brief overview of the prevailing treatment of criminal sanctions across many traditional asylum-receiving states, with explicit reference to British asylum policy and the CJEU case of X, Y and Z. Finally, the chapter advances a viewpoint on the serious and, thereby, persecutory nature of the ‘mere existence’ of such legal sanctions.

Citation

Relevant Evidence Summaries

The evidence was reviewed and included in the following summaries: 

Image of person with Pride flag

What works to support LGBTQ refugees?

As yet, there are no published outcome evaluations of programs or practices specifically for LGBTQ refugees. Existing best practice recommendations are based on stakeholder consensus. ▪ Three separate stakeholder consensus reports all yield similar recommendations for addressing the unique needs of this population. All recommendations revolve around creating a “safe space” through specific practices. Evidence […]

About this study

AGE: Adults

DIRECTION OF EVIDENCE: No evidence about impact

FULL TEXT AVAILABILITY: Paid

GENDER: All

HOST COUNTRY: United Kingdom

HOST COUNTRY INCOME: High

OUTCOME AREA: Legal Status

POPULATION: Asylees

STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE: Suggestive

TYPE OF STUDY: Suggestive evidence

YEAR PUBLISHED: 2019

More STUDIES