Diversity initiatives in the US workplace: A brief history, their intended and unintended consequences

Year Published:

Abstract

Diversity initiatives are designed to help workers from disadvantaged backgrounds achieve equitable opportunities and outcomes in organizations. However, these programs are often ineffective. To better understand less-than-desired outcomes and the shifting diversity landscape, we synthesize literature on how corporate affirmative action programs became diversity initiatives and current literature on their effectiveness. We focus specifically on work dealing with mechanisms that make diversity initiatives effective as well as their unintended consequences. When taken together, these literature point to several inequality-specific omissions in contemporary discussions of organizational diversity initiatives, such as the omission of racial inequality. As we contend in the first section of this review, without affirmative action law, which initially tasked US employers with ending racial discrimination at the workplace, we would not have diversity initiatives. We conclude by providing directions for future research and elaborating on several core foci that scholars might pursue to better (re)connect issues of organizational diversity with the aims of equity, equality and social justice.

Citation

Relevant Evidence Summaries

The evidence was reviewed and included in the following summaries: 

What are the impacts of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in nonprofit settings?

One source of strong evidence shows that diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training can have significant short-term impacts on knowledge, attitudes, and awareness. Seventeen of the 23 included studies reported statistically significant results on at least one of their measured outcomes, with knowledge, attitudes, or awareness being the most commonly reported. However, only six studies […]

About this study

AGE: Adults

FULL TEXT AVAILABILITY: Paid

GENDER: All

HOST COUNTRY: United States

POPULATION: Other

STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE: Suggestive

TYPE OF STUDY: Suggestive evidence

YEAR PUBLISHED: 2022

More STUDIES