What is the evidence for improving the employment outcomes of refugee women through employment programs?
Evidence Database | Advanced Evidence Search | Evidence Summaries
Evidence Summary
December 2020
There is a lack of evidence about the impact of employment programs on employment rates for either refugee women or men.
- A 2015 comprehensive systematic review of the effects of interventions on refugees’ labor force participation rate, employment rate, use of cash assistance, income, job retention, and quality of life identified no studies for inclusion due to methodological weaknesses. Consequently, the review did not find any evidence for or against any intervention. This review included programs serving both women and men. Several subsequent suggestive studies of refugee women’s entrepreneurial activities and gig economy work have found inconclusive results.
- Several interventions have been found to be effective at improving labor market outcomes of low-income adults in general. The strategies that appear most effective are financial incentives and sanctions, education, work experience, and training. Interventions that combine several strategies to help low-income workers find and keep jobs appear more effective than any single strategy.
Rigorous research on the effectiveness of employment programs for both male and female resettled refugees is needed.
- Given that early self-sufficiency through employment is a primary goal of the U.S. refugee resettlement program, evaluations of the impact of employment programs are critically needed.
Studies included in the database focused on high-income or upper middle-income countries, including but not limited to the United States. Studies included must have been published since 2000. To identify evidence related to employment outcomes among refugees, we searched the following websites and databases using the following population, methodology, and target intervention terms:
Websites and Databases | Population Terms | Methodology Terms | Target Intervention Terms |
Campbell Collaboration |
refugee OR asylee OR T-visa OR U-visa OR Cuban OR Haitian OR Amerasian OR immigrant OR low English proficien* |
evaluation OR impact OR program OR intervention OR policy OR Project OR train* OR therapy OR treatment OR counseling OR workshop OR review OR meta-analysis OR synthesis |
(women or female) |
For databases or websites that permitted only basic searches, free-text terms and limited term combinations were selected out of the lists above, and all resultant studies were reviewed for relevance. Conversely, for databases or websites with advanced search capability, we made use of relevant filters available. All search terms were searched in the title and abstract fields only in order to exclude studies that made only passing mention of the topic under consideration.
After initial screening, Switchboard evidence mapping is prioritized as follows: First priority is given to meta-analyses and systematic reviews, followed by individual impact evaluations when no meta-analyses or systematic reviews are available. Evaluations that are rated as impact evidence are considered before those rated as suggestive, with the latter only being included for outcomes where no evidence is available from the former.
Relevant Study | Type of Study | Strength of Evidence | Direction of Evidence |
Refugee women as entrepreneurs in Australia | Suggestive evidence | Suggestive | No impact |
Triple Disadvantage? A first overview of the integration of refugee women | Suggestive evidence | Suggestive | Positive impact |
Syrian women refugees in Jordan: opportunity in the gig economy | Suggestive evidence | Suggestive | Inconclusive or mixed impact |
Interventions to Improve the Economic Self-sufficiency and Well-being of Resettled Refugees: A Systematic Review | Systematic review | Strong | Inconclusive or mixed impact |
Integrating refugees into host country labor markets: Challenges and policy options. | Suggestive evidence | Suggestive | Inconclusive or mixed impact |
Which Employment Strategies Work for Whom? A Meta-Regression | Systematic review | Strong | Positive impact |