What is the impact of cultural competence training among health and mental health providers?
Evidence Database | Advanced Evidence Search | Evidence Summaries
Evidence Summary
July 2020
Evidence about the impact of cultural competence training on client health and mental health outcomes is generally inconclusive.
- Five systematic reviews, including one review of reviews, all published within the past ten years, concur that existing studies lack adequate methodological rigor to draw conclusions about the impact of cultural competence training and programming. Additionally, existing studies have produced contradictory results, showing either a positive impact or no impact. These systematic reviews have examined cultural competence training in general, not specifically as it relates to resettled refugees.
Virtual and experiential refugee-specific cultural competence training approaches show promising results.
- Several studies have examined changes in health care provider attitudes, knowledge, and/or skills associated with refugee-specific cultural competence training. These studies have examined virtual and/or experiential learning. The studies have found improvements primarily in providers’ attitudes such as empathy and confidence in providing care. However, these studies all used uncontrolled pretest-posttest or posttest-only designs; thus, their findings are only suggestive and promising for further research.
Studies included in the database focused on high-income or upper middle-income countries, including but not limited to the United States. Studies included must have been published since 2000. To identify evidence related to cultural competence training, we searched the following websites and databases using the following population, methodology, and target problem terms:
Websites and Databases | Population Terms | Methodology Terms | Target Problem Terms |
Campbell Collaboration Cochrane Collaboration Mathematica Policy Research Evidence Aid Urban Institute Migration Policy Institute HHS OPRE ASSIA Social Services Abstracts Social Work Abstracts PsycInfo CINAHL PILOTS |
refugee OR immigrant OR “unaccompanied minor” OR asylee OR “temporary protected status” OR “victims of traffick*” OR “traffick* victims” OR T-Visa OR U-Visa OR Cuban OR Haitian OR Amerasian |
evaluation OR impact OR program OR intervention OR policy OR project OR train* OR therapy OR treatment OR counseling OR workshop OR review OR meta-analysis OR synthesis |
“cultural competence” |
For databases or websites that permitted only basic searches, free-text terms and limited term combinations were selected out of the lists above, and all resultant studies were reviewed for relevance. Conversely, for databases or websites with advanced search capability, we made use of relevant filters available. All search terms were searched in the title and abstract fields only in order to exclude studies that made only passing mention of the topic under consideration.
After initial screening, Switchboard evidence mapping is prioritized as follows: First priority is given to meta-analyses and systematic reviews, followed by individual impact evaluations when no meta-analyses or systematic reviews are available. Evaluations that are rated as impact evidence are considered before those rated as suggestive, with the latter only being included for outcomes where no evidence is available from the former.