Coping strategies among immigrant women who have experienced intimate partner violence in North America: A narrative review

Year Published:

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is experienced in every society. IPV can cause severe mental, physical, social, and economic consequences for survivors, and impact their interpersonal relationships in their families, communities and broader society. Coping strategies may be utilized to minimize or tolerate the internal and external difficulties of such stressful situations. A significant number of IPV victims are immigrants in the U.S. and Canada. This study explores what is known about these victims’ coping strategies to develop a better understanding of existing studies in the literature. We systematically reviewed qualitative studies on immigrant female IPV survivor coping strategies that were published in peer-reviewed journals between the year 2007 and 2017. We sought to answer the question, “What is known about coping strategies utilized by female immigrant survivors’ of IPV in the US and Canada?” Eight qualitative studies were reviewed, and the results showed that survivors utilized multiple formal and informal coping strategies. We critically explored and summarized the eight studies to understand how immigrant women utilize coping strategies.

Citation

Relevant Evidence Summaries

The evidence was reviewed and included in the following summaries: 

What works to prevent and respond to intimate partner violence among refugees?

A variety of interventions may be effective in preventing or responding to intimate partner violence (IPV) among refugees. Strong evidence supports the effectiveness of IPV prevention and response interventions that: consider the unique contexts of refugees and immigrants, engage with community members, and are tailored according to participants’ lived experiences, needs, and abilities. There is […]

About this study

AGE: Adults

FULL TEXT AVAILABILITY: Paid

GENDER: Female

HOST COUNTRY: Multiple countries

POPULATION: Immigrants

STRENGTH OF EVIDENCE: Strong

TYPE OF STUDY: Systematic review

YEAR PUBLISHED: 2019

More STUDIES