Systematic review of prevention and management strategies for the consequences of gender-based violence in refugee settings

« Return to search

Abstract:

Uncertainties continue regarding effective strategies to prevent and address the consequences of gender-based violence (GBV) among refugees. The databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Anthropology Plus, EMBASE, DARE, Google Scholar, MSF Field Research, UNHCR and the regional and global indices of the WHO Global Health Library were searched twice within a 6-month period (April and September 2011) for English-language clinical, public health, basic and social science studies evaluating strategies to prevent and manage health sequelae of GBV among refugees before September 2011. Studies not primarily about prevention and treatment, and not describing population, health outcome and interventions, were excluded. The literature search for the prevention and management arms produced 1212 and 1106 results, respectively.

After reviewing the titles and abstracts, 29 and 27 articles were selected for review in their entirety, none of which met the inclusion criteria. Multiple panels of expert recommendations and guidelines were not supported by primary data on actual displaced populations. There is a dire need for research that evaluates the efficacy and effectiveness of various responses to GBV to ultimately allow a transition from largely theoretical and expertise driven to a more evidence-based field. We recommend strategies to improve data collection and to overcome barriers in primary data driven research.

Access Evidence

Citation:

Asgary, R., Emery E. Fau-Wong., Marcia, Wong, M.. (2013). "Systematic review of prevention and management strategies for the consequences of gender-based violence in refugee settings," International Health, 5():85-91. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24030107.


Keyword(s): Gender-based violence, Internally displaced persons
Type of Study: Systematic Review
Direction of Evidence: Meaningful positive impact
Strength of Evidence: High confidence level